Religion And Discrimination :: essays research papers

Religion and DiscriminationOne might dash the view that society should be tolerant to any religionso long as it con plaster casts to our laws and written constitution. At first glance,this statement lift upms as fit an settlement as possible to the question of societallimits to apparitional tolerance. Unofrtunately, if one were to consider thematter with more caution, one would eventually see that the statement could onlybe part of a greater answer. It is without a consideration of some of theelements which perform cults, as well as other factors, that one would falterin devising a definitive answer to the question.Certain followings or faiths which claim to be religions that are plethoric today are, in actuality, forms of cults. Although most of thepractices and elements common to cults are legal, they are, at best, suspect.The following should constitute the line of telerance society should not cross.Firstly, what distinguishes cults from religions is the manner in whichthe y operate. Cults are knowing with a view of insulating the individual fromthe rest of society. Once a instalment of a cult, in most cases, the individual isremoved of most (if not all) of their personal autonomy. Most decisions aremade by the cult leader, irritate to the removed world is often denied, and allinformation about the outside world is distorted by the leader. These types ofoperations should be intolerable by society.Second, thither should be no tolerance for religions that espouse anyform of sacrifice, be it human or animal. Although historically, thesepractices were more or less prevalent and accepted, there certainly is no placefor them in modern times.Lastly, there should be a limit of religious tolerance with regards tothe manner in which some display their beliefs. Individuals in society shouldnot be return toa ny violence or restriction of freedom as a payoff ofsomeone elses beliefs. at that place have been numerous illustrations of this in thepast. Individu als have out of use(p) abotion clinics, have participated in violentdemonstrations concerning one issue or another, ad infinitum. These types ofreligiously-fuelled practices have no place in, and should not be tolerated, in impart day society.For some, the state has been seen to usurp the place of God on occasion.The fervent belief held by Jehovahs Witnesses, in assence, acts as the basis oftheir religious dissent. There have been certain areas of the law, whichhistorically, have given rise to the conflict betwixt the Canadian legal systemand Jahovahs Witnesses. As a result of this conflict, a myriad of implicationshave arisen.